← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #75,918,688
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-20 22:28:26 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #75,918,688 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x74825c4e…32e9
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1ab
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0685b0e6…ca96
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2a3d051c…00ca
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5abea9c8…7f25
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x60f3212d…3ce5
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x74825c4e34…8832e9
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity