← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,114,425
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-21 20:12:30 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,114,425 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5w06w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0004
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xeb0915f1…c150
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4175c118…c734
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0aa885fa…a3d1
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xd5bfc8fb…071f
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0000
0x2b37ef…0bdc
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0001
0x2b37ef…0bdc
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000004
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity