← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,115,085
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-05-21 20:16:55 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
30%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.8
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,115,085 · 10 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w04w15w27w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd619a7d8…16a8
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x47b807a2…3307
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x7e35d721…8b5e
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity