← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,229,439
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-05-22 08:58:34 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
13%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,229,439 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0178c2de…b37d
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x74825c4e…32e9
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xb7c8652f…ebce
0x1111b3…4111
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x085df2c1…305a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3347cbe5…846c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3c35979a…975d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a8
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity