← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,237,769
13 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-22 09:54:07 UTC
Parallelism
85/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.08
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,237,769 · 13 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a8
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xee8d39c4…3f56
0x5afd3e…7620
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0006
0x60bb42…87ea
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3378e8b6…20a9
0x754704…b603
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x50e1082618…a8843b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity