← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,283,975
20 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-05-22 15:01:28 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,283,975 · 20 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w16w18w212w313w414w018w119w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb80
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0xa6afd3…d132
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x09f780a4…9b99
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0xf2f76ab3…623e
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000018
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity