← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,480,786
5 transactions · 4 stateful · 2026-05-23 12:52:00 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
25%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,480,786 · 5 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x8a35acfb…d1a0
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a2
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0xbdcc6247…faf9
0x8d66a4…3095
3 touches
1 conflict
0x22e81583…6d62
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x313f2565…5b00
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x34f142fc…3bde
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x8a35acfbc1…6bd1a0
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity