← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,480,862
14 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-05-23 12:52:30 UTC
Parallelism
86/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.14
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,480,862 · 14 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w09w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf9b8ae99…32b4
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x60f7fbaf…bd58
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a5
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf9b8ae99…32b3
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x6eba5e7f…4b52
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x9cc607d0…c9c7
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xa9988419…9f45
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x50e1082618…a8843b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity