← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #76,529,208
7 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-05-23 18:14:20 UTC
Parallelism
71/100
Blocked
33%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.29
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #76,529,208 · 7 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w14w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x50e10826…843b
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc009105d…96f7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a7
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8a35acfb…d1a6
0x8d66a4…3095
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Perpl: Oracle / Operator Hub
1 conflict on slot 0x50e1082618…a8843b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity