← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #77,434,039
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-05-27 22:42:52 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #77,434,039 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x2c674540…3271
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x1f5a2e2b…65f1
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x45f562b2…9294
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity