← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #79,407,717
20 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-06-06 02:07:55 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.7
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #79,407,717 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w04w15w26w37w18w19w216w017w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd53220ed…473b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x520a8689…4f03
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity