← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #80,138,879
18 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-06-09 11:34:28 UTC
Parallelism
89/100
Blocked
27%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.17
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #80,138,879 · 18 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w05w16w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc3c8642a…7da5
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf2f76ab3…623e
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7c9e1cd5…1b1c
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x6fd9ae7c…e982
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity