← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #80,293,009
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-06-10 04:42:13 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
10%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #80,293,009 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6w07w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x1728ed63…499c
0xea1b8e…c5ec
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00bac013…a28c
0xfd44b3…00d1
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x40970e69…da50
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5cc231f5…f1cd
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x8cf3d245…1d0d
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xb05cd4f5…73d0
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: LeverUp: LeverUp
1 conflict on slot 0x1728ed6317…a9499c
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity