pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
docs
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#80,380,920
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #80,380,920
10 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-06-10 14:28:06 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
17
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#80,380,920
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x5bf9264c
· blocks 1
#3
executeBatch
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
setData
#7
0xe7b9c4…fa43
#8
0x262e7f…b977
#9
0x39435dac
#2
0x5bf9264c
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xac2a0273…7212
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09a15b10…2639
0x754704…b603
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5149ba0e…d954
0x754704…b603
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x04c8137b…e776
0xe52b14…7230
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09e0690d…6e3d
0xe52b14…7230
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b0c2e8d…c1b8
0xe52b14…7230
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xac2a02739b…817212
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity