← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #80,843,170
15 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-06-12 17:50:58 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.93
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #80,843,170 · 15 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w07w18w210w311w412w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f1e40f…09a3
0x3bd359…433a
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x527f20e3…82e7
0x754704…b603
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x17606ba6…1b6e
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x02652a29…dddd
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Wrapped MON (WMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0xd9f1e40f03…3209a3
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity