pev
.
One block, wave by wave
→
analytics
docs
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#81,003,502
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #81,003,502
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-06-13 11:39:27 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#81,003,502
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
0x39435dac
#5
0x98717539
#6
0x6df9e92b
· blocks 1
#8
0x6a2d41e6
#9
setData
#7
0x6df9e92b
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xa472d565…9fe4
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x30e3f228…0d43
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x8e5cc690…b06b
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x9961af48…ac3c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xc0b9bd73…7f1c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe57631d4…a589
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Wrapped MON (WMON)
1 conflict on slot
0xa472d565a0…ae9fe4
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity