← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,410,282
20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-06-24 15:20:00 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
41%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #83,410,282 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w26w37w08w010w011w113w116w117w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x928d6b23…5374
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x78dc21fb…30c3
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00002f
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity