← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,641,909
22 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-06-25 17:05:55 UTC
Parallelism
77/100
Blocked
41%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #83,641,909 · 22 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w14w25w06w17w28w311w213w417w120w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xbd68c7c7…40b3
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x69017fce…85be
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xa525d948…f7d6
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity