pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#83,758,723
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,758,723
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-06-26 06:05:10 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#83,758,723
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
0x785f5745
#3
execFwdPositionOps
#4
0x6a3e170e
#5
setData
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
0xc7e3ec2c
#7
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xb147eeb0…d658
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x490911cc…5fea
0x0c65a0…0852
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xc2314176…8737
0x0c65a0…0852
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2514b0f5…2f79
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x326a02b5…8dad
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xb147eeb07e…40d658
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity