← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,842,113
20 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-06-26 15:21:42 UTC
Parallelism
70/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.35
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #83,842,113 · 20 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w010w111w212w313w414w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0xa6afd3…d132
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x15695e81…ae3b
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0x99220815…6ba7
0x40c49f…2af0
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5da4ed2f…283f
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001f
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity