← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,866,359
16 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-06-26 18:03:30 UTC
Parallelism
69/100
Blocked
33%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.56
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #83,866,359 · 16 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w16w07w18w29w311w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb80
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x5b3ab9ad…ace3
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x0b16149e…7d4d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0002
0xd637b3…4160
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity