pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#83,876,953
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #83,876,953
9 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-06-26 19:14:10 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#83,876,953
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execFwdPositionOps
#2
0x0c7abd22
#3
forward
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
setData
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
0xc7e3ec2c
#7
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x7c93b38a…9e69
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0efc210e…70ab
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf4a9476c…c511
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf6d214b0…8abe
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb80
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x19805670…b4f4
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x7c93b38ab4…099e69
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity