← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,073,523
20 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-06-27 17:03:49 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
42%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.6
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #84,073,523 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w14w25w06w17w28w311w212w017w018w119w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xd637b3…4160
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x40c49f…2af0
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe7def1c6…087d
0x40c49f…2af0
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46279ae7…20dd
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0xd637b38f…c64160
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity