pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#84,120,028
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,120,028
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-06-27 22:13:49 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#84,120,028
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
0x0f6795d9
#3
0x0f6795d9
#4
0xec2bd3f2
· blocks 1
#5
0xed82b078
#7
0x6a404b95
#8
setData
#9
0xc7e3ec2c
#6
0x6df9e92b
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xa472d565…9fe4
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x08203bf1…719e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x08e8f2c9…a11a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09500602…94e9
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09500602…94ea
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09c8c2ec…6a61
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Wrapped MON (WMON)
1 conflict on slot
0xa472d565a0…ae9fe4
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity