pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#84,185,106
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,185,106
8 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-06-28 05:26:51 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
17
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#84,185,106
· 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
repay
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
0xb0b8ff…ab13
#4
execFwdPositionOps
#5
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#7
setData
#6
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xafd867b7…2b2e
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1b6e8fc2…73d4
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xafd867b7…2b2d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09500602…94ea
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x200db05e…6327
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x206fb8db…a146
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x670c8f48…a21c
0x57ea24…2cec
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xbbd96e4f…d11f
0x57ea24…2cec
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xafd867b7ed…d92b2e
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity