pev
.
→
showcase
new
graph
analytics
docs
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#84,500,794
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,500,794
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-06-29 16:31:00 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#84,500,794
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
0x0f6795d9
#4
forward
#6
updateTemporalNumericValuesV1
#7
0xed82b078
#8
0x6a429e3b
#9
setData
#5
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
5
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…003d
0x40c49f…2af0
4 touches
1 conflict
0xb98f9147…2139
0x40c49f…2af0
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x326a02b5…8dad
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01a89030…f786
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5b571ba0…f13a
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x40c49f17…d22af0
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…00003d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity