← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,544,158
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-06-29 21:20:23 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #84,544,158 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
0w06w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
4 touches
1 conflict
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2965e2d6…5800
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x393dfd73…ff57
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x58c659ec…3c6c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x9c4c3928…4c9d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xab86573c…682e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xce213c58…eff3
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Monad: Staking
1 conflict on slot 0x0900000000…000007
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity