pev
.
→
showcase
new
graph
analytics
docs
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#84,598,109
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #84,598,109
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-06-30 03:20:14 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#84,598,109
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
updatePrices
#5
0x0f6795d9
#6
0x39435dac
· blocks 1
#8
setData
#7
0x0f6795d9
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
6
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf06c2cf5…61bd
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x14f6fe51…1c24
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xafd867b7…2b2d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x56785e37…a197
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe75cebb6…6b36
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x7d42dc8b…fdb6
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xf06c2cf5e4…3161bd
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity