pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#85,165,507
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,165,507
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-07-02 18:24:46 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#85,165,507
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
execFwdPositionOps
#6
0xed82b078
#7
0x6a46ad65
#8
setData
#9
execOrders
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x6bdb9869…7558
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x1757b8ff…9a71
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4caf91f9…8ab5
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5c10927c…58e5
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x85a88798…f85e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xa92c8763…6d7f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x6bdb9869c7…427558
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity