pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#85,211,446
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,211,446
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-07-02 23:30:38 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#85,211,446
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
removeLiquidity
#2
0xab083028
#3
updatePrices
#4
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#8
setData
#9
0xc7e3ec2c
#7
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd29e547b…a1dd
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1d25799d…5161
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x58603063…4ef0
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5fad6fee…7714
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x915a620c…9959
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa9988419…9f45
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0006
0x60bb42…87ea
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3378e8b6…20a9
0x754704…b603
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xd29e547b5d…35a1dd
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity