← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,281,909
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-07-03 07:20:02 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #85,281,909 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x6eff5416…605d
0xea1b8e…c5ec
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00bac013…a28c
0xfd44b3…00d1
4 touches
1 conflict
0x3dbd9177…e936
0xea1b8e…c5ec
3 touches
1 conflict
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xef65bff3…7c9d
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x40970e69…da50
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5cc231f5…f1cd
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x8cf3d245…1d0d
0x69df8a…6292
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: LeverUp: LeverUp
1 conflict on slot 0x6eff5416ed…f5605d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity