pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#85,769,536
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,769,536
10 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-07-05 13:28:23 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
17
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#85,769,536
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execute
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#5
execFwdPositionOps
#6
0x9450f0…90cb
#7
setData
#8
0x5f2f88…4067
#9
execOrders
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x5e782d17…5318
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x09106a95…1467
0x33176b…e078
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xdbadf6b0…43b2
0x33176b…e078
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x170e4e4c…2b90
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x213a54fa…c85f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x39cc2185…cacb
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x5e782d178d…db5318
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity