pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#85,854,489
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,854,489
23 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-07-05 22:54:19 UTC
Parallelism
83
/100
Blocked
24
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.3
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#85,854,489
· 23 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
0xa96df62f
#5
execPerpOps
#6
execPerpOps
#7
execFwdPositionOps
#8
0x3f5c179b
#9
redeemPyToToken
#10
execFwdPositionOps
#11
0x6df9e92b
· blocks 3
#15
0x204ce421
#16
0x6a4ae113
#17
setData
#18
0x1e3cd9…8203
#19
0x3fb1c5…53f0
#20
0x53c5b4…8a7a
#21
execOrders
#22
execOrders
#2
0xab083028
#12
0x6df9e92b
· blocks 2
#13
0x6df9e92b
· blocks 1
#14
0x6df9e92b
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
11
w0
12
w1
13
w2
14
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x1ccfa324…0b93
0x0a917f…7777
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xa472d565…9fe4
0x3bd359…433a
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xe6f2ae57…2026
0x3bd359…433a
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0000
0x431fed…d150
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0002
0x431fed…d150
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0003
0x431fed…d150
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x44ad89ba…cf83
0x0a917f…7777
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x0a917fcc…9d7777
6 conflicts on slot
0x1ccfa32498…500b93
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity