pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#85,990,588
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #85,990,588
27 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-07-06 14:01:41 UTC
Parallelism
85
/100
Blocked
40
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.44
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#85,990,588
· 27 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0x575c0012
#6
0xcf7468f4
#7
0x6a4bb5bd
· blocks 1
#8
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#10
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#11
updatePrices
#13
execFwdPositionOps
#14
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
0x3f5c179b
#18
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#20
transfer
#21
setData
#22
0xa0236e…2077
#23
0xf6cc6b…eec3
#25
0x5d2fd812
#26
0xc7e3ec2c
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#12
updatePrices
#16
0x3f5c179b
#19
0x6a4bb5bd
#24
execOrders
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#4
execute_route
#9
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w2
7
w0
8
w0
9
w3
10
w0
12
w1
16
w1
18
w0
19
w1
24
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c1
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6a84b8f8…9681
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…00001a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity