pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,134,297
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,134,297
11 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-07-07 06:01:02 UTC
Parallelism
82
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.09
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,134,297
· 11 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
execOrders
#3
execOrders
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
0xee83e0a5
#6
batchUpdate
#7
0x6a4c9696
#8
setData
#9
execOrders
· blocks 1
#10
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
9
w0
10
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x63c900f4…2600
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x28c180e1…f1e2
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa486f342…64d5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x01a89030…f786
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5b571ba0…f13a
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x68faa0b9…14af
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xcd621226…2df8
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x63c900f479…962600
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity