pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,166,918
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,166,918
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-07-07 09:38:46 UTC
Parallelism
63
/100
Blocked
29
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
3
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,166,918
· 8 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
setData
#6
0x934e95…fc8c
#3
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#7
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
7
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe06bbb2e…9416
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x326a02b5…8dad
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x63c900f4…2600
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe06bbb2e…9417
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7f8804d2…902d
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0xac060410…a869
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x09500602…94ea
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xe06bbb2ef5…889416
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity