pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,167,786
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,167,786
8 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-07-07 09:44:33 UTC
Parallelism
63
/100
Blocked
33
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
3
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,167,786
· 8 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x6a4ccaf9
#2
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
setData
#5
0x9ff86d…bf16
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#7
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
6
w1
7
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x65903ef9…2567
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5dd1f5d4…deac
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xb577a4a7…a670
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xea02471d…1542
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5d7f309d…5145
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x69ce640b…884a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x737acb78…fce8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x65903ef9a0…7d2567
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity