pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,258,740
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,258,740
28 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-07-07 19:52:03 UTC
Parallelism
82
/100
Blocked
40
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.54
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,258,740
· 28 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#5
0x0c7abd22
#7
execOrder
#8
0x1094dc9f
#11
0x8263f5d9
#12
execOrders
#13
execOrders
#14
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#16
execPerpOps
#17
execPerpOps
#19
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 2
#20
0xed82b078
#21
0x6a4d595b
#22
setData
#25
execOrders
#26
0x5d2fd812
#27
0xc7e3ec2c
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#9
0x1094dc9f
#10
0xab083028
#23
execOrders
· blocks 1
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#24
execOrders
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#18
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
4
w2
6
w3
9
w1
10
w1
18
w4
19
w0
23
w1
24
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xed98e255…abac
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0xea02471d…1542
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xf3d10975…0d07
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x6637e421…af93
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x55b2239f…fec5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe5e7089a…fb91
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
10 conflicts on slot
0xed98e2554e…85abac
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity