pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,705,110
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,705,110
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-07-09 21:36:50 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,705,110
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updatePrices
#2
0x5a5d9a99
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
0x0f6795d9
· blocks 1
#6
0x0f6795d9
#7
setData
#8
0xb8024e40
#9
0xc7e3ec2c
#5
0x0f6795d9
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
5
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xb448b3f9…fdb9
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0002
0x04fdea…47d7
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0c939a14…b763
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x15b254ac…664f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x1c8791b4…3145
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4b8a9ad7…a838
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xb448b3f96d…f0fdb9
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity