← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,705,430
15 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-07-09 21:38:58 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
31%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.27
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #86,705,430 · 15 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
0w04w05w06w17w19w112w013w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5b9e5ecc…2bc7
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7e5ea60a…c4aa
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x2f0505af…422a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x92385428…6941
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x326a02b5…8dad
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Monad: Staking
1 conflict on slot 0x0900000000…000007
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity