pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,851,895
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,851,895
27 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-07-10 13:57:41 UTC
Parallelism
81
/100
Blocked
44
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.44
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,851,895
· 27 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#3
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 5
#7
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#8
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#9
0x6a50facc
#11
0x3f5c179b
#12
execFwdPositionOps
#14
0x36f359b0
#15
0x4b0413…31e7
#16
0x3379c6…b727
#17
0xf18e2d…4646
#18
0x413b70…373b
#19
setData
#20
0x667882…8ac2
#21
0x53be4c…0ed7
#22
0xd2acdc…25c7
#23
0xe99e39…c2ed
#26
0xc7e3ec2c
#2
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#4
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 2
#13
execFwdPositionOps
#5
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 2
#10
0x3f5c179b
#6
0x5a5d9a99
#24
execOrders
· blocks 1
#25
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w0
4
w1
5
w2
6
w3
10
w2
13
w1
24
w3
25
w4
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xfaef08b1…0696
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x588380ee…0a5c
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf81d0d0f…cf78
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x13a54fa2…5ae3
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…003d
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
1 conflict
0x17c44db3…8888
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4e81fd84…81ff
0xa6afd3…d132
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
6 conflicts on slot
0xfaef08b108…f90696
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity