pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,906,763
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,906,763
24 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-07-10 20:04:40 UTC
Parallelism
79
/100
Blocked
35
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.63
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,906,763
· 24 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0xab083028
#7
0x6a5150cf
#8
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#10
0x785f5745
#11
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 2
#12
execFwdPositionOps
#13
execFwdPositionOps
#15
updateTemporalNumericValuesV1
#16
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#18
transfer
#19
setData
#20
0xb74510…195c
#21
0xd5e576…5f14
#22
0x3a0c2a…769e
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#9
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#14
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#23
execOrders
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#6
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
6
w4
8
w0
9
w1
11
w0
14
w1
23
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x4ca7b6ba…56a0
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x08330b36…ae29
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x3b9bb58c…e73a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xfaef08b1…0696
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x01e7b865…6e6f
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe75ce681…ba5f
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xe75ce681…ba61
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
10 conflicts on slot
0x4ca7b6ba15…bd56a0
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity