pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#86,928,103
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #86,928,103
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-07-10 22:27:14 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#86,928,103
· 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
execFwdPositionOps
#3
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
setData
#7
0xf3de2a…3d51
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xa0c9bb84…ba20
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe283e878…7262
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe3ffeb7c…45e0
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x16363afe…d410
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x07bb3f5a…617e
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1d351a9b…f2dd
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x423d9a98…bc7c
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xa0c9bb84f1…e2ba20
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity