pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#87,519,492
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #87,519,492
34 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-07-13 16:21:31 UTC
Parallelism
94
/100
Blocked
22
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.06
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#87,519,492
· 34 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#3
0x5a5d9a99
#4
execOrder
#5
execOrder
#6
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#7
execOrder
#8
execOrder
#9
execOrder
#10
execOrder
#11
execOrder
#12
execOrder
#13
execOrder
#14
execOrder
#15
execOrder
#16
execOrder
#17
execOrder
#18
execOrder
#19
execOrder
#20
execOrder
#21
execOrder
#22
execOrder
#23
execOrder
#24
execOrder
#25
execOrder
#26
execOrder
#27
execOrder
#28
execOrder
#29
execFwdPositionOps
#30
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#32
setData
#33
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
#31
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
30
w0
31
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x7aad02c6…b979
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe5bb3628…e5f1
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c0
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x7aad02c682…feb979
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity