pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#89,545,625
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #89,545,625
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-07-23 02:12:55 UTC
Parallelism
63
/100
Blocked
29
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.38
Longest chain
3
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#89,545,625
· 8 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
#0
syscallReward
#1
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 2
#5
0x57368ddf
#6
execOrders
#7
setData
#3
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
4
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x000bde1a…e123
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x6e19c9a0…7d86
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaee07474…271a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xbcbf5d09…8bac
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0db691ab…3ee3
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x25957369…c648
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2ed3536e…7a55
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x000bde1afc…91e123
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity