pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#89,836,360
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #89,836,360
23 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-07-24 05:42:35 UTC
Parallelism
61
/100
Blocked
50
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.83
Longest chain
9
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#89,836,360
· 23 txs across 9 waves · depth 9
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
0x3f5c179b
#4
execFwdPositionOps
#5
execFwdPositionOps
#6
0x6a62fbc3
#7
setData
#8
execOrders
#9
execOrders
#10
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 8
#11
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 3
#12
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 2
#13
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 7
#14
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 1
#15
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 6
#16
0xc7e3ec2c
#17
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 5
#18
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 4
#19
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 3
#20
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 2
#21
0xc7e3ec2c
· blocks 1
#22
0xc7e3ec2c
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
10
w0
11
w0
12
w1
13
w1
14
w2
15
w2
16
w3
17
w3
18
w4
19
w5
20
w6
21
w7
22
w8
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x92339d95…0800
0x0000a8…8888
18 touches
36 conflicts
0x92339d95…0800
0xb1c8ea…8888
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x08de772c…8e84
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01a89030…f786
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5b571ba0…f13a
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x68faa0b9…14af
0x368ee5…7ca4
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x0000a8fd…758888
36 conflicts on slot
0x92339d95cd…a80800
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity