pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#89,844,002
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #89,844,002
9 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-07-24 06:21:10 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.22
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#89,844,002
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execFwdPositionOps
#2
0xce1e7030
#3
0xce1e7030
#4
execOrders
· blocks 1
#5
0x6a6304cd
#6
setData
#7
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
7
w0
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x680fdd59…e84d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0f2d78b1…7363
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaf54a4a7…3467
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x304a552a…8fc7
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x304a552a…8fc8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3df0422c…fd38
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x680fdd5929…bce84d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity