pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#91,103,279
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #91,103,279
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-07-28 16:17:32 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#91,103,279
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xa96df62f
#2
updatePrices
#3
updatePrices
#4
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#7
setData
#9
0xc7e3ec2c
#8
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xb56f0740…7542
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf5ed96fe…7424
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…00c9
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00f6a8a7…0e6e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0a0cecef…4ed0
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0fe1e6e0…f553
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x1088dfef…9fc2
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xb56f0740e2…c17542
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity