pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#91,127,174
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #91,127,174
9 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-07-28 18:17:44 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#91,127,174
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#2
execFwdPositionOps
#3
0x3f5c179b
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
setData
#7
execOrders
#8
execOrders
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x85ef7abc…decf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcd5c0ecb…4b5f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x054afe69…16e8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x159aac52…c583
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x29780a3b…8294
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2d3930d3…c9b8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x31b39922…1e65
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x85ef7abcb9…1edecf
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity