pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#91,281,435
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #91,281,435
11 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-07-29 07:14:36 UTC
Parallelism
82
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.09
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#91,281,435
· 11 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
0x5a5d9a99
#3
0x5a5d9a99
#4
deposit
#5
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#7
execFwdPositionOps
#8
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#9
0x6a69a8d4
#10
setData
#6
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x5502e1cc…3910
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0003
0x0c65a0…0852
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2dc9a229…bd5a
0x0c65a0…0852
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x52c63247…ce02
0x0c65a0…0852
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x22af2208…099e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x5502e1cc19…1a3910
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity